EDXRF Analysis of Nickel Concentrate and Filter Cake

While processing nickel, typically sulfidic or lateritic ores are initially crushed and milled to a fine powder. Water is added for creation of a pumpable slurry that is treated with reagents during floatation for concentrating the nickel. The concentrate is further processed by smelting creating nickel rich matte while the impurities are removed as slag.

The matte that is rich in base metals is then converted, and leaching processes form a separate nickel stream. A copper stream is also obtained as sulfidic and lateritic ores are also rich in copper. Copper and nickel streams are purified in preparation for electro-winning in order to produce pure nickel and copper anodes. The resulting slag from smelting is processed for the recovery of base metals and PGMs. It is possible to use the slag composition for monitoring kiln health in the determination of tear-down time for the prevention of catastrophic failure. In this article, the analysis of filter cake, nickel concentrate and furnace slag is shown.

Figure 1.


Model: Rigaku NEX CG
X-ray tube: 50 W Pd-anode
Excitation: Indirect with polarization
Detector: High performance SDD
Analysis Time: 600 sec
Environment: Helium Purge
Standard: 15-position Sample Tray (32mm)
Option: Manual Sample Press

Figure 2.

Sample Preparation

The preparation of each sample is done by grinding to a dry, fine, homogenous powder of less than 200 mesh or less than 75 µm particle size using a ball mill or ring-and-puck shatterbox. In order for measurements to be done a sample is prepared by weighing 5g of the sample in a standard 32 mm XRF sample cup. The sample was then compacted with 500 inch-pounds of torque using a Manual Sample Press to ensure consistent compaction.


A separate empirical calibration was built for each matrix type that includes concentrate, filter cake, matte and slag. Each calibration makes use of between 10 to 23 well assayed standards of the respective sample type, and alpha corrections are then employed to automatically compensate for variations in X-ray absorption and enhancement effects within the sample due to the independent variations in element concentration. A summary of each empirical calibration is shown here.

Table 1. Nickel Concentrate - 10 Standards

Component Concentration Range (mass%) RMS Deviation R2 Confidence
MgO 0.08 - 0.28 0.024 0.8983
Al2O3 0.09 - 0.24 0.023 0.9192
SiO2 0.09 - 0.98 0.034 0.9872
S 31.00 - 33.30 0.496 0.7185
CaO 0.10 - 0.71 0.032 0.9111
Fe 34.20 - 38.20 0.75 0.8337
Co 0.91 - 1.17 0.028 0.9454
Ni 19.70 - 25.30 0.279 0.9899
Cu 0.38 - 1.38 0.012 0.993


In order to demonstrate repeatability, one representative sample was selected from each calibration. The measurement of each sample was done in static position for 10 repeat analyses with a total analysis time of 600 sec per measurement, with typical results shown below.

Table 2.

Sample: Nickel Concentrate       Units: %
Component Standard Value Average Value Std Dev % Relative
MgO 0.14 0.148 0.003 2
Al2O3 0.16 0.152 0.002 1.3
SiO2 0.68 0.69 0.01 1.4
S 31.8 31.84 0.03 0.1
CaO 0.71 0.7 0.01 1.4
Fe 36.9 36.2 0.06 0.2
Co 1.02 0.99 0.03 3
Ni 22 22.1 0.06 0.3
Cu 0.44 0.42 0.003 0.7

Qualitative Analysis

Spectral analyses for each of the samples showed clean isolation of the respective peaks of interest. Select spectra from the RX9 polarization target and the Mo target show excellent peak separation of the main elements as well as the extremely low background produced by indirect excitation. The following legend is used: Red (Concentrate); Green (Filter Cake); Gray (Matte); Purple (Slag)

Figure 3.

Figure 4.


The empirical approach shown here provides the most accurate results, with accuracy mainly determined by the goodness of the calibration standards and their assay values. Normally, suites of calibration standards are built from samples taken at the mine and processing sites and assayed using ICP. Samples that need to be used as calibration standards are selected to model each specific sample type by choosing samples that spread evenly across the expected concentration range for each respective element. This enables the use of matrix correction factors (also called alpha corrections) that model the expected variations in concentration of each specific matrix. When ore types are used that fall outside the ranges for a calibration, extra samples are accumulated and assayed. The additional standards just need to be added to the existing calibrations to define extended concentration ranges.


The Rigaku NEX CG combines indirect excitation with secondary targets, polarization targets, and a high-performance SDD detector to offer the right performance for elemental analysis of ores. During the entire processing cycle, especially during smelting, elemental and oxide composition of the ore material must be reliably monitored to ensure optimal process control and profitability. The Rigaku NEX CG analyzer is a suitable tool all through the quality control process. Furthermore, the NEX CG can be used for monitoring air filters for air quality emission control, and UltraCarry can be used to monitor process effluents to ppb range detection limits, making the NEX CG a versatile and valuable tool for several applications within ore mining and processing.

This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by Rigaku Corporation.

For more information on this source, please visit Rigaku Corporation.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Rigaku Corporation. (2020, August 18). EDXRF Analysis of Nickel Concentrate and Filter Cake. AZoMining. Retrieved on April 15, 2021 from https://www.azomining.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478.

  • MLA

    Rigaku Corporation. "EDXRF Analysis of Nickel Concentrate and Filter Cake". AZoMining. 15 April 2021. <https://www.azomining.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478>.

  • Chicago

    Rigaku Corporation. "EDXRF Analysis of Nickel Concentrate and Filter Cake". AZoMining. https://www.azomining.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478. (accessed April 15, 2021).

  • Harvard

    Rigaku Corporation. 2020. EDXRF Analysis of Nickel Concentrate and Filter Cake. AZoMining, viewed 15 April 2021, https://www.azomining.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=478.

Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback