Analysis of Impurities in Lead

Lead (Pb) is extremely toxic to living organisms, prompting this element to be phased out of an array of products.

However, Pb is still frequently employed in a number of applications, most notably alloys, lead-acid batteries, radiation shielding, ammunition, flashing in the construction industry and as lining in industrial pipes and baths designed to carry corrosive substances.

To accommodate this wide range of uses, an equally wide range of grades and purity levels of lead are produced. The London Metal Exchange is responsible for issuing specifications for an array of different metals in several grades.

This article explores the use of the analysis of lead of different purities with PerkinElmer’s Avio® 550 Max fully simultaneous ICP optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES). It uses the “Special Contract Rules for Standard Lead1” for guidance on analytes and concentrations.



Analyses were performed in 1% solutions of Pb in order to simulate digests that have been diluted 100x with 5% nitric acid (v/v). Elemental spikes were added to the 1% Pb solution at the levels set in the “Special Contract Rules for Standard Lead.” This was done to confirm accuracy.

Calibration standards were generated using 5% HNO3 at 50, 100 and 200 ppb in 1% Pb solutions. The “Method of Additions – Sample Intercept” section of the guidance (Figure 1) was employed as the calibration scheme in order to mitigate any matrix effects in the plasma.

The Method Editor in Syngistix™ software provides a check box to enable method of additions along with pull-down selection of sample intercept, calculated intercept and calibrate calibrations schemes.

Figure 1. The Method Editor in Syngistix™ software provides a check box to enable method of additions along with pull-down selection of sample intercept, calculated intercept and calibrate calibrations schemes. Image Credit: PerkinElmer 


All analyses were conducted using the Avio 550 Max ICP-OES. The parameters used are provided in Table 1, while the analytes and wavelengths used are provided in Table 2. The standard sample introduction parameters and configuration were utilized for each analysis, and the torch position was set at -4.

Table 1. Avio 550 Max ICP-OES Instrumental Parameters and Conditions. Source: PerkinElmer

Parameter Value
Nebulizer MEINHARD® K-1
Spray Chamber Baffled glass cyclonic
RF Power 1500 W
Injector 2.0 mm ceramic
Plasma Gas Flow 8 L/min
Aux Gas Flow 0.2 L/min
Nebulizer Gas Flow 0.60 L/min
Torch Position -4
Sample Uptake Rate 1.0 mL/min
Sample Uptake Tubing Black/Black (0.76 mm id)
Internal Standard Tubing Green/Orange (0.38 mm id)
Drain Tubing Red/Red (1.14 mm id)
Replicates 3
Plasma View Axial


Table 2. Elements and Wavelengths. Source: PerkinElmer

Element Wavelength (nm)
Ag 243.778
As 193.696
Bi 223.061
Cd 214.440
Cu 327.393
Fe 259.939
Ni 221.648
Sb 231.146
Sn 189.927
Zn 206.200
Sc (int std) 361.383


A combination of the Avio 550 Max’s simultaneous analysis and its minimal argon consumption (9 L/min total) affords users significant savings, particularly when taking into account the cost of argon.

Results and Discussion

The London Metal Exchange provides a number of different specifications for Pb. This case study focused on 99.97% and 99.985% Pb specifications for BS EN 12659:1999 (Lead and Lead Alloys) and GB/T 469-2005 (Lead Ingots) (Table 3).

Table 3. Specifications for Pb Purities Used in this Work. Source: PerkinElmer

  BS EN 12659:1999 (Lead and Lead Alloys) GB/T 469-2005 (Lead Ingots)
  99.97% 99.985% 99.97% 99.985%
Element Concentration
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Ag 0.005 0.0025 0.005 0.0025
As 0.001 0.0005 0.001 0.0005
Bi 0.03 0.015 0.03 0.015
Cd 0.001 0.0002 0.001 0.0002
Cu 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001
Fe --- --- 0.002 0.001
Ni 0.001 0.0005 0.001 0.0005
Sb 0.001 0.0005 0.001 0.0008
Sn 0.001 0.0005 0.001 0.0005
Zn 0.0005 0.0002 0.0005 0.0004


Table 4. Analyte Spike Levels in 1% Lead. Source: PerkinElmer

Element Spike Levels (mg/L)
Ag 0.25, 0.5
As 0.05, 0.1
Bi 1.5, 3
Cd 0.02, 0.1
Cu 0.1, 0.3
Fe 0.1, 0.2
Ni 0.05, 0.1
Sb 0.05, 0.08, 0.1
Sn 0.05, 0.1
Zn 0.02, 0.04, 0.05


The analytes were spiked into 1% Pb solutions at the concentrations outlined in Table 4 in order to assess the instrument’s ability to conduct accurate measurements at these levels. This accounted for a 100x dilution for sample preparation; for example, pure lead diluted 100x before analysis.

% Recoveries of analytes in 1% Pb, spiked at the 99.97% and 99.985% limits.

Figure 2. % Recoveries of analytes in 1% Pb, spiked at the 99.97% and 99.985% limits. Image Credit: PerkinElmer

The plot shown in Figure 2 confirms that elements at each of the four different specifications shown in Table 3 recover within 10% of their true values. This demonstrates the methodology’s accuracy.

Spectral interferences on Sn and Zn required the application of a Multicomponent Spectral Fitting (MSF) model2 to remove the effects of the interferences, facilitating accurate results at each purity level.

Elements were spiked into 1% Pb at 20 µg/L, the equivalent of 0.0002 wt%, in order to determine the instrument’s ability to measure even lower concentrations in 1% Pb.

% Recoveries of analytes in 1% Pb, spiked at 0.020 mg/L, representing 0.0002 wt % (* = elements specified at 0.0002 wt % in 99.985% Pb).

Figure 3. % Recoveries of analytes in 1% Pb, spiked at 0.020 mg/L, representing 0.0002 wt% (* = elements specified at 0.0002 wt% in 99.985% Pb). Image Credit: PerkinElmer

This concentration is either at or below the specifications for 99.990% and 99.994% Pb (Table 5).1 Figure 3 shows the recoveries, robustly demonstrating the methodology’s suitability for accurately measuring these lower concentrations.

Table 5. Specifications for 99.990 and 99.994% Lead (units in wt%). Source: PerkinElmer

Element BS EN Lead and
Lead Alloys: 99.990%
GB/T Lead
Ingots: 99.994%
Ag 0.0015 0.0008
As 0.0005 0.0008
Bi 0.0100 0.004
Cd 0.0002 ---
Cu 0.0005 0.001
Fe --- 0.0005
Ni 0.0002 ---
Sb 0.0005 0.0008
Sn 0.0005 0.0005
Zn 0.0002 0.0004


With the methodology’s accuracy confirmed, its stability was assessed by observing the internal standard signal over a 6 hour analysis of 1% Pb.

Figure 4. Internal standard (Sc) stability over a 6-hour analysis of 1% Pb. All data is normalized to the first reading. Image Credit: PerkinElmer

Results of this observation are plotted in Figure 4, revealing a variation of less than + 3% over 6 hours when normalized to the first reading. This confidently demonstrates the methodology’s stability.


The case study and experiments outlined above clearly show the Avio 550 Max ICP-OES’s ability to analyze solutions of 1% Pb. It can perform this successfully for elements at levels specified by the London Metal Exchange for purities ranging from 99.97% to 99.994%.

While the high matrix concentration led to spectral interferences for a handful of the elements, MSF can be employed to overcome these, allowing each of the specified elements to be measured at its required concentrations.

The Avio 550 Max fully simultaneous ICP-OES is more than capable of measuring traces in lead to meet the London Metal Exchange requirements.


  1. “Special Contract Rules for Standard Lead,” The London Metal Exchange.
  2. “Multicomponent Spectral Fitting,” Technical Note, PerkinElmer, 2017.

Consumables Used

Table 6. Source: PerkinElmer

Component Part Number
Sample Uptake Tubing,
Black/Black (0.76 mm id), PVC
N0777043 (flared)
09908587 (non-flared)
Drain Tubing, Red/Red
(1.14 mm id), PVC
Internal Standard Tubing,
Orange/Green (0.38 mm id), PVC
N0773111 (flared)
Antimony Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300207 (125 mL)
N9300101 (500mL)
Arsenic Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300180 (125 mL)
N9300102 (500 mL)
Bismuth Standard, 1000 mg/L N9303761 (125 mL)
N9300105 (500 mL)
Cadmium Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300176 (125 mL)
N9300107 (500 mL)
Copper Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300183 (125 mL)
N9300114 (500 mL)
Iron Standard, 1000 mg/L N9303771 (125 mL)
N9300126 (500 mL)
Nickel Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300177 (125 mL)
N9300136 (500 mL)
Scandium Standard, 1000 mg/L N9303798 (125 mL)
N9300148 (500mL)
Silver Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300171 (125 mL)
N9300151 (500 mL)
Tin Standard, 1000 mg/L N9303801 (125 mL)
N9300161 (500mL)
Zinc Standard, 1000 mg/L N9300178 (125 mL)
N9300168 (500 mL)
Autosampler Tubes B0193233 (15 mL)
B0193234 (50 mL)


This information has been sourced, reviewed and adapted from materials provided by PerkinElmer.

For more information on this source, please visit PerkinElmer.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    PerkinElmer. (2021, April 06). Analysis of Impurities in Lead. AZoMining. Retrieved on June 23, 2021 from

  • MLA

    PerkinElmer. "Analysis of Impurities in Lead". AZoMining. 23 June 2021. <>.

  • Chicago

    PerkinElmer. "Analysis of Impurities in Lead". AZoMining. (accessed June 23, 2021).

  • Harvard

    PerkinElmer. 2021. Analysis of Impurities in Lead. AZoMining, viewed 23 June 2021,

Ask A Question

Do you have a question you'd like to ask regarding this article?

Leave your feedback