Deep-Sea Mining Technologies: Can Innovation Make Ocean Mining Sustainable?

By Ankit SinghReviewed by Laura ThomsonOct 29 2025

Deep-sea mining is being proposed as a solution to the increasing global demand for critical minerals needed in modern technologies, such as renewable energy systems and electric vehicles. Interest in tapping into mineral-rich deposits on the ocean floor has grown due to the depletion of terrestrial mineral resources and the potential for vast reserves found in polymetallic nodules, massive sulfides, and cobalt-rich crusts beneath the sea. However, this technological promise brings significant controversy.

Image Credit: Gallwis/Shutterstock.com

The scale and potential impacts of deep-sea mining have sparked intense debate among scientists, policymakers, and advocacy groups. At the heart of the issue is a difficult question: how can we meet the rising demand for these resources without causing irreversible damage to fragile deep-sea ecosystems? Striking a balance remains one of the central challenges in determining whether deep-sea mining can ever be truly sustainable.

Resource Potential and Industry Drivers

Polymetallic nodules, mainly consisting of manganese, nickel, copper, and cobalt, are abundant on abyssal plains between 3,000 and 6,000 meters deep. These deposits and cobalt-rich crusts found on seamounts and massive sulfides near hydrothermal vents offer reserves that could theoretically supply essential metals for centuries. The largest concentrations of these nodules are located in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) of the Pacific, where surveyed reserves exceed terrestrial stocks several times.

As terrestrial alternatives dwindle, ocean deposits have become increasingly important in discussions about future mineral supply.^1,2,3

Industry leaders cite the necessity of these resources for the low-carbon transition and global electrification. Due to the high demand for clean energy technologies, exploration efforts and several pilot mining operations are already underway or planned by multinational consortia. However, despite decades of technological development, large-scale commercial deep-sea mining has not yet begun. Its future depends as much on regulatory frameworks and scientific knowledge gaps as they do on extraction technology.?^1,2,4

Environmental Concerns of Deep-Sea Mining

Deep-sea ecosystems are among the most biodiverse and least understood environments on Earth. They include the abyssal plains that support specialized life forms, seamounts rich in coral and sponge communities, and hydrothermal vents where unique, endemic species thrive. But deep-sea mining threatens these habitats in several ways:²

• Physical destruction: Seabed extraction disrupts substrate, kills resident fauna, and destroys habitats for nodule-dependent species. More than 50 % of the organisms in the CCZ that rely on nodules for survival will be at risk if deep-sea mining is carried out in this zone.^1,2
• Biodiversity loss: Mining activities can cover hundreds of thousands of square kilometers, potentially causing irreversible biodiversity loss over generations.^2,3
• Sediment plumes: Mining equipment generates plumes of suspended particles and tailings, spreading fine sediments and potentially toxic metals across extensive areas. These plumes can suffocate filter feeders and alter turbidity far beyond the mining site.?^1,4
• Noise and light pollution: Mining equipment may disrupt acoustic and visual cues in marine life, affecting species from whales to deep-dwelling bioluminescent organisms.?^1,2,4
• Ecosystem services at risk: Deep-sea environments play a crucial role in carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Disturbances to these areas could impact global climate regulation, as studies have shown a decline in carbon cycling decades after simulated mining events.^1,2,4
• Slow Biological Recovery: Long-term experiments have revealed that the biological recovery of mined sites is extremely slow, with species density and diversity significantly lower than baseline levels even decades post-disturbance. These findings highlight the necessity for thorough environmental impact assessments before industrial activities.⁵

These cumulative effects have led many experts to argue that deep-sea mining risks irreversible ecosystem impacts. As over 90 % of species in the CCZ are still undescribed by science, the full scope of mining’s effects remains unknown.?²

Current and Emerging Technologies in Deep-Sea Mining

Technological advances are pivotal in minimizing the impact and improving sustainability in deep-sea mining. Current operations utilize pipeline lift systems paired with remotely operated collection vehicles to extract mineral resources from the ocean floor.

Earlier techniques, such as drag buckets and bucket lines, caused significant disruptions and were inefficient. This led to the development of more precise vehicles equipped with mechanical or hydraulic gathering tools. Industry leaders have recently focused on various innovations to improve these processes.^1,3

• Tracked mining vehicles: These advanced vehicles can navigate rough terrain with improved precision, reducing unnecessary seabed disruption.?^1,6
• Risers and Lift systems: Such systems are essential for transporting extracted minerals from the seabed to surface platforms. The deployment of these systems at commercial operational depth remains a significant technical challenge.?¹
• Autonomous underwater vehicles: The vehicles are powered by artificial intelligence designed to selectively harvest nodules while leaving colonized ones intact. This reduces ecological disturbance.?⁶
• Sediment plume management: Chemical flocculants have been proposed to accelerate particle settlement, potentially limiting plume spread.?¹
• Real-time environmental monitoring: Advanced sensors and in-situ observation platforms facilitate adaptive management of environmental impacts as mining proceeds.?^1,6
• Noise and light mitigation: Designing equipment with lower acoustic output and shielded lighting may minimize disruption to sensitive marine species.?^1,2

While these approaches are promising, none have fully resolved the issue of sediment plumes, habitat destruction, or cumulative impact across ecological scales. The lack of baseline ecological knowledge further complicates implementing and evaluating mitigation strategies.?^1,2

Regulatory and Scientific Challenges

The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is responsible for developing regulatory frameworks for mining operations in areas beyond national jurisdiction. So far, the ISA has issued numerous exploration contracts and is actively discussing regulations that could permit industrial mining of the seabed. However, governance speed often lags behind technological advancements, leading critics to highlight regulatory shortcomings in ensuring environmental protection.²

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) frameworks are evolving to tackle the unique risks of deep-sea mining. Key requirements include thorough baseline studies, continuous environmental monitoring, adaptive management strategies, and regular ecological reviews.^1,7

Click here to download a PDF copy of this page

A major drawback still exists, as the biological baselines and functional diversity of deep-sea ecosystems are not sufficiently understood to accurately predict or manage the impacts of mining. Calls for moratoriums or “pause” periods are growing among the scientific community and some policymakers. They argue that more documentation of deep-sea habitats and further research on mining impacts are essential before large-scale industry.?^1,2

The Path Forward: Is Sustainability in Deep-Sea Mining Possible?

The future of deep-sea mining as a sustainable industry remains uncertain. Its success hinges on balancing demands for critical minerals with strong protections for deep-sea ecosystems.

Technological innovation is necessary but insufficient to mitigate ecological risks. Rigorous baseline data, advanced plume modeling, and real-time monitoring are essential to minimize impacts effectively. Moreover, precautionary approaches and strong regulatory safeguards are needed to prevent unforeseen consequences, recognizing that knowledge gaps are still significant.?^1,2,8

Future industry practices may embrace hybrid models incorporating less invasive mining techniques, stringent restoration efforts, alternative sourcing, and circular economy strategies. True sustainability may require rethinking resource extraction methods and how their necessity and value are measured in an interconnected world.?^1,2,8

The debate over sustainable deep-sea mining will continue as the technology advances and the understanding of the deep ocean improves. Achieving sustainability is feasible for now, but it requires careful collaboration among industry stakeholders, scientists, regulators, and the public. This collaboration should be guided by the best available evidence and a strong commitment to protecting the health and integrity of the planet’s last frontier.^1,2,8

References and Further Reading

1. Yao, W. et al. (2025). Development of deep-sea mining and its environmental impacts: A review. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, 1598584. DOI:10.3389/fmars.2025.1598584. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1598584/full
2. Deep-sea mining: the ecosystems at risk and potential impacts. (2023). Deep Sea Conservation Coalition. https://deep-sea-conservation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/DSCC_FactSheet2_DSM_science_4pp_OCT_23.pdf.pdf
3. Runwal, P. (2023). The deep-sea mining dilemma. Chemical & Engineering News. https://cen.acs.org/environment/water/deep-sea-mining-dilemma/101/i33
4. Leal Filho, W. et al. (2021). Deep Seabed Mining: A Note on Some Potentials and Risks to the Sustainable Mineral Extraction from the Oceans. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(5), 521. DOI:10.3390/jmse9050521. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/5/521
5. Jones, D. O. et al. (2025). Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track. Nature, 642(8066), 112-118. DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-08921-3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08921-3
6. Deep-sea Mining State of Technology. (2022). DSM Observer. https://dsmobserver.com/2022/04/deep-sea-mining-state-of-technology-2022/
7. Ning, Y. (2025). Advancing EIA framework for deep-sea mining: A critical review of current regulations and proposals. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, 1612889. DOI:10.3389/fmars.2025.1612889. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1612889/full
8. Wang, C. et al. (2025). Embracing a new era of deep-sea mining: Research progress and prospects. Marine Policy, 180, 106778. DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106778. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X25001939

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.